• tellafriend.gif about this week's Newsletter.

Jan. 06 ~ Jan. 11, 2008

Black Pope lies to China
By Nicholas
Jan. 11, 2008

In an article released by Zenit today it appears the Roman Catholic Jesuit General Peter-Hans Kolvenbach, aka "The Black Pope," has set his sights on China as a retirement gift to himself. Now, yes, it's a well known fact by many of those that follow global pie slicing and movements of the Vatican and its prelates that China has already agreed back in 2005 to bow to the Vat of sin in Rome in 2008. This will bring the total to 175 nations in agreement with Rome out of the 192 on the planet. Do some research and you will find that those nations still undecided, wars and rumors of war are their outlook if they continue to balk. (Yes, Iran is one of them)

This soon to be realized agreement with China was to no doubt prevent an all out War with the USA, who is in fact Rome's enforcer as prophecy predicted. Sadly, the others, like Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam, etc, didn't properly contemplate just how serious Rome is about their New World Order.

In Christianity, the true Christian spreads the Gospel message so as to help win the world to Christ via Heavenly peace. In Catholicism, the Vatican spreads the threats of lethal force via whatever superpower they control at the time. Presently they do this via their puppets in Washington D.C. so as to help win the world for the Pope. The last puppet of Rome was of course Hitler.

"Democracy is a michievous dream where the Catholic Church does not predominate." -Brownson's Review.

“It is the office of the Papacy to tread under foot kings and emperors.” J.H. Ignaz Dollinger, in The Pope and the Council, (London), page 35

"There is one, and only one, sure democracy, the Catholicism of the Popes" -The Catholic World, Oct, 1937.

Film of Pius XII coronation with audio.See http://www.almocollegiocapranica.it/pioxii.html (The coronation begins at 18:46 into the film. These are the actual words spoken:) Accipe thiaram tribus coronis ornatam, et scias te esse Patrem Principum et Regum, Rectorem Orbis, in terra Vicarium Salvatoris Nostri, cui est honor et gloria in sæcula sœculorum. TRANSLATED ...Receive the tiara adorned with three crowns and know that thou art Father of Princes and Kings, Ruler of the World, Vicar of Our Savior on earth, to him be the honor and glory forever and ever. (For more info on this, click here)

This announcement is nothing short of pre-retirement, legacy cultivating, grand standing for Kolvenbach. He wants to claim China as his baby. What stands out is the way he lies through his teeth as to why he wants to "return to China." In the article he says...

"According to the demands of the mission, there will always be an incredible variety of options and apostolic works, but in all of them, three responsibilities can be found together: announcing the word of God, sharing the life of Christ, and witnessing to the charity that the Spirit urges and nourishes."

First off, some will proclaim this a good thing. As is well known however, China has been killing Christians for eons. To this day Christianity is still illegal in that country. Their excuse is of course that China is an ancient land with ancient ideals that Christianity will threaten. Nevertheless, Rome isn't offering Christianity is it? They are offering to bring Catholicism to China.

When the big wigs get behind closed doors they will open the real agenda behind Roman Catholicism and show the Chinese leaders just what this church as to offer them. A globally controllable religion! No threat whatsoever to their already established religious systems because Rome is all about the ecumenical group hug which preaches your god is our god. Plus, with Catholicism, you already have an infrastructure of control over the masses set up on a group as well as an individual basis built right in. From the confessionals that were first designed to get secrets from kings, to the Eucharist that can be paraded as a god, which by the way can be used to kill as well. This is of course becomes even more enticing when they explain the mass mind control methods offered them via their demonic apparitions.

This religion is perfect for big governments that want to control the people by making them think they are getting what they want, when all along it is the exact opposite. Christianity is a threat to the Chinese Empire for it will cause all those converted to Christ to give up many of the worldly traditions and false gods and idols that keep their business owners and political leaders pockets filled with cash. But Catholicism is no threat at all for this market. This is why Russia had no problem allowing Catholicism in their borders a few years ago. Once it was explained to them what it's really all about, they realized it's not a threat at all. In fact it's a bevy of unlimited benefits to government leaders.

So.. with that said, I would like to ask one question of Mr Kolvenbach. He claims to be desirous of bringing Christianity to China. Mr Kolvenbach, can you please explain to the world at large as to how the following excerpt from the official Jesuit Oath that you personally require of all your underlings as a way for Christians to announce "the word of God, sharing the life of Christ, and witnessing to the charity that the Spirit urges and nourishes?"

I furthermore promise and declare that I will, when opportunity present, make and wage relentless war, secretly or openly, against all heretics, Protestants and Liberals, as I am directed to do, to extirpate and exterminate them from the face of the whole earth; and that I will spare neither age, sex or condition; and that I will hang, waste, boil, flay, strangle and bury alive these infamous heretics, rip up the stomachs and wombs of their women and crush their infants' heads against the walls, in order to annihilate forever their execrable race. That when the same cannot be done openly, I will secretly use the poisoned cup, the strangulating cord, the steel of the poniard or the leaden bullet, regardless of the honor, rank, dignity, or authority of the person or persons, whatever may be their condition in life, either public or private, as I at any time may be directed so to do by any agent of the Pope or Superior of the Brotherhood of the Holy Faith, of the Society of Jesus.

click here for entire Jesuit Oath and sources

The governments of this world are finally figuring out that Christianity is one thing, and Catholicism another. What Pope Pius X stated long ago is proof beyond a doubt that Rome has never changed! Their mortal wound is almost completely healed!

The Encyclical of Pope Pius X, issued in 1864, asserted: 

  • the right to require the State not to leave any man free to profess his own religion;
  • the right to employ force;
  • the right to claim dominion in temporal things;
  • the right to have the entire control of public schools;
  • the right to hold princes and kings in subjection;
  • the right to treat all marriages as invalid which are not solemnized according to the forms of the Council of Trent;
  • the right to prevent the State granting to immigrants the public exercise of their own worship;
  • the right to require the State not to permit free expression of opinion;

None of this global power in Rome is possible without the strength of the USA behind it. This is why, during the Reagan administration, President Ronald Reagan, after much pressure, appointed an ambassador to Vatican City. When W. Kenneth Dan was asked why we need an ambassador in Vatican City, He replied; "It would allow the USA to influence the political decisions of the ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH!"

The only hope for this western world is an alliance between the Roman Catholic church which is the most commonly, influential, controlling, unifying, element, in Europe and the western orthodox church. ...The only hope for the western world lies then in a united Europe under the control of the Pope. -Charles Malik former president general assembly of the united nations. Ambassador to the U.S. from Lebanon.

Europe was the testing grounds for the One World Government. Now that they know it works, America is next, and then THE WORLD.

Full article


Mary, the goddess of Rome
By Nicholas
Jan. 10, 2008

Straight from the Vatican Press we have Mr Ratzinger, aka "God's Rotweiller" standing as Pope and in his first "sermon" of the year echoing ancient blasphemies as Roman Catholic dogma. In an article titled, "On Mary, Mother of God" we find the present Pope pushing Mary into the position of a deity worthy of worship. The term "Mother of God" is a deception to say the least. Yes, Jesus Christ is part of the Godhead, and we do worship Him as God and Creator. However, He repeatedly declared His mission on earth to stand as a man who was to live and die for man. If this were not so, then He could not have died for us, for God cannot die. Mary is the Mother of Jesus, and yes Mother of the Son of God as was prophecied. But the way Rome speaks of her places her before God and worthy of worship before Him. Calling her Mother of God in this fashion denotes she was there before God, and therefore God could not be there without her.

There are other aspects of this "Marian worship" that goes directly against the grain of Biblical jurisprudence. Rome preaches, and Pope Benedict echoes the following assumptions...

The title Mother of God, which is so profoundly linked to the Christmas celebrations, is for this reason the fundamental appellation with which the community of believers has, we might say, always honored the Holy Virgin. It expresses very well Mary’s mission in the history of salvation. All of the other titles attributed to the Madonna find their basis in her vocation to be the Mother of the Redeemer, the human creature elected by God to realize the plan of salvation, centered on the great mystery of the incarnation of the divine Word.

First off notice how Mary is glorified in such a way that denotes salvation would have been 100% impossible without her. Truth be known, women named Martha, Joan, Sandra, or even Penelope could have been called to carry Christ as a child. This position is a blessed one indeed, but it does not place her above Christ. Yes, "all generations shall caller "her" blessed" (Luke 1:48.) And we do. But call her God? No! Never!

Continuing in his sermon, Mr Ratzinger said...

From the title “Mother of God” are drawn all the other titles with which the Church honors Mary, but this one is the fundamental title. We think of the privilege of the “Immaculate Conception,” of being, that is, immune from sin from the moment of her conception: Mary was preserved from every stain of sin because she had to be the Mother of the Redeemer. The same goes for the title “Assumed”: she who gave birth to the Savior could not be subjected to the corruption that comes from original sin. And we know that all these privileges are not given to distance Mary from us, but on the contrary to make her more near; in fact, being totally with God, this Woman is very close to us and helps us as mother and sister.”

Again, the Pope speaks error so as to glorify a "creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever." (Romans 1:25) Mary, a mere human is placed on a pedestal where the Pope in fact declares her to be "totally with God." Here Mr Ratzinger is pushing her into the Godhead without so much as a single Bible verse to authenticate it. His comments placing her as a necessity in our salvation confirms this is where he sees her. History confirms this is where Rome has always placed their "Queen of Heaven" as Jeremiah called their Pagan goddess in Jeremiah 7:18, 44:17, 18, 19, & 25. Rome has published millions of articles, books, and sermons with this very same Pagan title, (Queen of Heaven) further proving that yes, Mary is in the Godhead of the Roman church.

To further confirm this as fact, notice how the Pope states Mary is without sin, immune to sin, and even one that escapes the unbiblical doctrine of "original' sin." If she is without sin, why did she say in Luke 1:47 "And my spirit hath rejoiced in God my Saviour." According to Scripture, to be without such sin makes one to be in the same neighborhood of the Godhead, for only God is without sin. When it comes to mankind (including Mary) "There is none righteous, no, not one:" -Romans 3:10

The clincher here is they also declare Jesus Himself to be without "original sin" in their doctrinal books and yes, they declare Him God as they should. BUT.. this is the prophecied KEY to exposing them as Antichrist! How so? The Jesus of Rome is not the Jesus of Heaven!

The Word of the True God says...

  • 1 John 4:3, "And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world."

The Word is plain here. If a church proclaims that Jesus Christ did not come in the flesh, then that church is of Antichrist. No getting around that! Many Catholics to this day fight me on this tooth and nail. They proclaim their church does say that Jesus came in the flesh. But does this church really say Jesus came in the same flesh that you and I have? Notice an actual excerpt from the Roman Catholic Catechism book.

491. "Through the centuries the Church has become ever more aware that Mary, 'full of grace' through God,[Lk 1:28 .] was redeemed from the moment of her conception. That is what the dogma of the Immaculate Conception confesses, as Pope Pius IX proclaimed in 1854: The most Blessed Virgin Mary was, from the first moment of her conception, by a singular grace and privilege of almighty God and by virtue of the merits of JESUS Christ, Saviour of the human race, preserved immune from all stain of ORIGINAL SIN.[Pius IX, Ineffabilis Deus (1854): DS 2803

You can also verify this in the online version of the Catechism book... The Catechism of the Catholic church http://www.ziplink.net/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/kerygma/a.pl

Besides the fact they lie about Mary and her state of salvation, to declare that Jesus Christ came to this world in a flesh other than the flesh the catholic church teaches we as humans all bear, is to preach that Jesus did not come in the flesh we have! They say He came in a flesh "not stained" with the stain we supposedly bear. To say Jesus did not have in His flesh what "we" supposedly have in ours since birth is to say He did not come in our flesh. Therefore, He can not possibly be the same Jesus Scripture speaks of but the Antichrist John spoke of in 1John 4:3.

The Roman Catholic Jesus is NOT the Jesus of the Bible. The Jesus of Rome cheated by preventing His flesh from being stained with what Rome calls "original sin." But what is the definition of original sin according to Rome?

Q. What is Original Sin?
A. Original Sin is the sin we inherit from Adam, the Father of the Human Race.
-The Convert's Catechism of Catholic Doctrine. p. 41

According to Roman Dogma, Original Sin is a sin we all supposedly inherit from Adam. Problem with that is the Bible proves it to be a bold faced lie. For it is written...

  • Ezekiel 18:20, "The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him."

The Word of God plainly states there is no such thing as "Original Sin." What we are born with is the SINFUL NATURE. We choose to sin when we come to the age of accountability. Jesus was also born with the sinful nature. Difference was, He chose NOT to sin. That is why death could not hold Christ in the grave. For death is the reward of sin.

One more thing. A multi-trillion dollar corporation like Rome knows how to spell check, and they certainly know how to use the English language. The word "Savior" that the pope used in his "sermon" is not the same as the word "Saviour" found in Scripture. Look it up in your dictionaries for example and you will find the word "Savior" (without the letter "U") denotes a person who rescues another from harm, danger, or loss. Like a lifeguard at the beach. A "Saviour" (with the letter "U") always denotes Jesus Christ incarnate. I ask, why is Rome using a lesser form of the word "Saviour" when speaking of Christ in a sermon that was written to glorify Mary?

Full article


AMA uses SWAT to invade Christian home
By Nicholas
Jan. 08, 2008

This may appear a bit off theme for this type of website, but I felt you may be interested to find an article that was just posted on wnd.com today. It broke a story about the use of the Colorado SWAT team members by the American Medical Association to terrorize a Christian family to enforce unwarranted medical care against their wishes. The article states,

"The accident happened during horseplay, Tom Shiflett told WND. John was grabbing the door handle of a car as his sister was starting to drive away slowly. He slipped, fell to the ground and hit his head, Shiflett said. He immediately carried his son into their home several doors away, and John was able to recite Bible verses and correctly spell words as his father and mother, Tina, requested. There were no broken bones, no dilated eyes, or any other noticeable problems. ...The paramedics were allowed to see the boy, and found no significant impairment, but wanted to take him to the hospital for an evaluation anyway. Fearing the hospital's bills, the family refused to allow that. "This apparently did not go over well with one of the paramedics and they started getting aggravated at Tom for not letting them have their way," a family acquaintance told WND. "

If you read the entire article (see link below) you will find the father of the boy was a Vietnam vet who served as a Paramedic and chose to treat the boy at home. This prompted a series of calls that eventually lead to a SWAT team breaking down the family door, throwing the parents and children to the floor to handcuff them, and then seizing the child to take him to the hospital against his parents wishes. Who by the way released the child when they found nothing wrong with the boy.

One though comes to mind here. Did they knock first to see if the parents would open the door peacefully? It doesn't appear so. What is apparent is, the paramedics that got aggravated took it upon themselves to call the police, who actually told them it was up to the parents. So they went further and further and further making calls until they literally got SWAT to knock the doors down. Still, this would not have been possible if it wasn't for the fact the father was a loyal American, because the article also went on to say...

 "The sheriff said the decision to use SWAT team force was justified because the father was a "self-proclaimed constitutionalist" and had made threats and "comments" over the years. However, the sheriff declined to provide a single instance of the father's illegal behavior..."

My attention was on my son," Shiflett said.

He said the SWAT team punched a hole in his door with a ramrod, and the first officer in the home pointed a gun right in the face of Tom's 20-year-old daughter.

"I don't know where social services ever got started, or where they got their authority," he said. "But I want to know why we have something in this country that violates our rights, that takes a parental right away." -SWAT officers invade home, take 11-year-old at gunpoint. Jan. 7, 2008 by Bob Unruch

If the father actually made threats, why wasn't he arrested years ago? Me thinks a fabrication in the Sheriff's office is afoot here to try and soften the blow in the up and coming lawsuits.

So.. why did I share such an article? Think about this simple fact. Without this type of power flaunting control, the United States of Rome won't be able to enforce their soon to be enforced mark upon the masses. They are getting the people used to the idea that when big government speaks, they do so very loudly, and there is little anyone can do to stop them. So.. let them do as they please. Let them have their day. Jesus will be back soon and all this won't matter anymore. In fact, we won't even think of such things in His Kingdom. It will all fade away forever.

Full article


Benedict and his new Popemobile
By Nicholas
Jan. 06, 2008

Today the Pope received his brand new customized Mercedes-Benz G-class. Stripped, this car is worth just over $83,000.00. (Tax free of course) But as we see in this pic on the right, it has been chopped for easy viewing of the man of sin, and decked to the hilt. The article released today stated, "It is equipped with a folding windscreen and hand-rails, and like its predecessors it is painted in the Vatican "mystic white" finish." After the additions, the $83,000.00 price-tag is replaced by a much larger one.

Question.. If any Protestant church leader purchased and customized a Mercedes-Benz G-class simply to drive around in and wave to people, do you not think the American government, or any government would come down on them like a load of bricks? Yes, they would, and have done so more then once in the past. Why? Because most civilized people understand ministers are not supposed to flaunt such riches. It's obviously an oxymoronic display when you see a man who claims to have Christian concerns for the poor and needy. What do you suppose the starving people think when they get a glimpse of all this? Do you suppose they would be offended? Jesus fed the hungry. (Mat. 14:21, 15:38) The Pope on the other hand feeds himself.

So I ask, why is it so acceptable for the Pope to drive around in a car worth more then most annual salaries on planet earth? Why is it he also has secret service men flanking him on every fender which avidly illustrates even more wasteful spending, and at the same time show a grandiose denial of God's ability to protect him? If he was truly the man God called to stand as leader, would he worry about what man could do to him? Where is his faith in God? (Before sending the obvious rebuttal in email, no, these men aren't apostles.) It has to do with the fact that he is not a Christian at all. This pomp and circumstance is a flagrant mockery of the Lord Jesus Christ and all that's holy. This display does more harm than good.

One would think a church so deep in debt due to all the molestation and War crimes lawsuits would trim back a bit? Can't the Catholic people see how they are being duped and taken advantage of by their Pope? Your tithe monies are paying for all this! Tithes are to be used to spread the Gospel, not lacquer on car fenders and white leather on seat cushions!

I am speaking directly to the Catholic when I say... If the doctrines don't prevent you from leaving this church. If your own children being molested won't get you to leave this church. If the closing of your schools to help pay for lawsuits won't get you to leave. If the closing of your churches to help pay for the lawsuits won't get you to leave. Perhaps spending well over $100,000.00 for "one" convertible for the Pope to parade around the smallest city on earth (Vatican City) may cause you think twice about tithing the next time the basket comes to your pew.

This Pope has been flaunting wasteful spending since day one with his extremely expensive fashion statements and festive "parties." The 1600 room Vatican alone should make people wonder. If Jesus Himself did not have a place to lay His head at night when He visited us 2000 years ago, (Mat. 8:20) why is it the Pope needs to reside in the largest mansion on earth? A mansion so large it can be seen from space.

If he is really a Christian, would he not emulate Christ? Would he not be more concerned in helping the needy then helping himself? But then again, this has always been the case for Rome. This is why they are being sued for stealing billions from the bank accounts of the Jews their man Hitler killed.

Absolutely every prophecy that's ever been uttered regarding the Antichrist have been proven fulfilled by the Popes of Rome!

Full article


 Discuss articles in...

The Presents of God ministry