The Most Powerful Man In The World?
The “Black” Pope

Count Hans Kolvenbach—The Jesuit’s General
4/15/00   RICK MARTIN

 So, you thought you were pretty well informed by now about all of the main players on the “conspiracy” playing field?  You’ve maybe been hearing for years about (or bumped into on your own) the various elements of society who control our world from behind the scenes.

You’ve gotten familiar with the role played by, for instance, the Khazarian Zionists (who invented the word “Jew” to disguise their adopted heritage, as distinguised from the biblical Judeans), or the role played by the Banksters (banking gangsters) controlling the economies of the world, by the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations), the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderbergers, the Committee of 300 (the 17 wealthiest so-called “elite” families)—the Rothschilds in England and Rockefellers in America and Bronfmans in Canada, and on and on, comprising the physical power structure of the New World Order puppets under the direction of darkly motivated, other-dimensional “master deceivers” commonly known as Lucifer or Satan and their “fallen angel” cohorts.

While all of those details contribute to understanding the Larger Picture, what you are about to read fills in a most important Missing Link in this entire structure.  And I don’t mean a little side issue; I mean a link so central—yet so well hidden from general public view, and for so long—that even the most studied of “conspiracy theory” scholars probably have not put together much of the information that is going to be presented here.

To call the following outlay “controversial” and “sensitive” is about as mild an understatement of the truth of the matter as can be made!  This missing link changes the entire slant of the entire playing field! 

After months of anticipation and weeks of preparation, I was finally able to speak with Vatican Assassins author Eric Jon Phelps on Tuesday, March 14.  There was simply no other way to cover Eric’s historic masterpiece spanning, literally, five centuries, than to just ask questions covering huge spans of time and major historical events.  It took us almost four hours to accomplish the task, yet we could easily have gone on for another forty.

We here at The SPECTRUM are simply unwilling to reduce the importance of this work by presenting it in a too distilled fashion.  In fact, in order to share this material with at least some of the pertinent backup, Eric has granted us permission to print (directly after the interview) several excerpts from his soon-to-be-published book which will help you in understanding certain aspects of this magnificently important and broad-sweeping story.  The missing link is surely a central link.

Let’s call this story the “Jesuit-Vatican connection” to the unfolding New World Order agenda.  You make up your own mind just how absolutely central, yet well hidden, has been this link!  There’s a good reason the secret Vatican library is so extensive and yet remains so intact from outside intrusion, despite the many others who would like to possess such a collection of information detailing much “censored” data about our true, otherworldy cultural heritage. 

When one reads a work like Vatican Assassins, one can’t help but reflect back on the purposely “adjusted” and watered down and boring moments in high school history class.  Meanwhile, the true history of what has gone on is dynamic and full of calculated intrigue.

In this business, I’ve heard and read a lot of things.  But when I had to pick my jaw up off the floor during the reading of certain historical portions in Eric’s book—well, let me just say that Truth certainly is stranger, and far more interesting, than the many fictions we’ve been led to believe are historical fact.  And yet The Truth does fit together like the pieces of a jigsaw puzzle.

This book SHOULD be a best-seller, but it is hardly likely to achieve such general attention—considering how well controlled and censored is the publishing business.  Thus is the reason for our lengthy presentation of this most astonishing and critically important material here in The SPECTRUM.

We are in a time of Truth being revealed from all directions.  And there is probably no more fundamental, mind-rattling, and previous notions-shattering example of that than what is being presented here.  The interview is directly followed by a number of pertinent excerpts from  Eric’s eye-opening book—which will be available July 1.

[Editor’s note:  It should be noted up-front that the information presented below is the studied opinion of Eric Jon Phelps.  We here at The SPECTRUM find much about his presentation of his historical research which meshes with and expands upon Truth which has been presented by many other authors in these pages and elsewhere.  And that is good;  Truth is Truth is Truth, and should all mesh.

However, for the peace of mind of our unique readership—which typically has cultivated a more aware spiritual perspective than the general public—we do not want to give the impression that we agree with (or wish to promote) some collateral aspects of Eric’s presentation having to do with his personal “religious” convictions.  The focus of those convictions follows a much more biblically conventional (literal) path—in stark contrast to the unconventional, questioning, wide-angle vision of his historical material.

Generally such opinions are simply allowed to stand on their own—for you to sort and interpret as you see fit—rather than being singled-out to be addressed editorially.  However, in this case, the practical side of Eric’s stated religious convictions include the condoning of some degree of violence (or violent protest) and use of armaments.  And such convictions are very much the opposite of our philosophical position—for many reasons, not the least of which is the obvious Adversarial bait-and-entrapment which would result from choosing what we would consider to be low-frequency responses to schoolroom Earth’s current challenges.

Yet, if the perceptive reader penetrates “between the lines” thoughtfully, there is glimpsed a recurring commendable spiritual message in Eric’s commentary—of “Have the courage to speak The Truth” and “God helps those who help themselves”—which we certainly DO agree with wholeheartedly and have long supported enthusiastically.

We are in the time of the Great Awakening on this planet.  The Light of Truth, intensifying with each passing moment, is nudging many to step forward and share what they know.  Will such ones follow that nudge or continue to hide in fear?  The answer to that question is perhaps the most important aspect of schoolroom Earth’s relentless testing at this critical time.

One last-minute footnote before beginning this interview:  The Arts & Entertainment (A&E) cable television channel just started to air—on Easter Sunday evening!—a new two-hour documentary called: The Vatican Revealed.  Tape it so you can study it carefully; within the lines of dialog and some of those people chosen for commentaries are many, many clues to the true power of the Vatican over world affairs.  It would, of course, be much more revealing to watch the A&E program AFTER having read and digested the following.]

Martin:  Before we begin, let me say a few words.  The topic of your book is so comprehensive and covers, literally, all aspects of global control by the Jesuits, dating back to 1540.  I would like to begin our conversation with a very important point of clarification so that our readers have something to hold onto while reading the historical narrative we are about to present.  Let me also add that your book is one of the most compelling, dynamic, genuinely educational historical documents I have ever read.  I want to tell you, I am impressed!

You, literally, link every major global conflict and political assassination to the hands of the Jesuit Order.  The Jews, as with many other groups you mention, have been the unwitting pawns in this Jesuit Agenda.

Today, the present.  I’m going to start here, and then we’re going to go way back in time and work our way up.  But, I want to start HERE because it will give a foundation for going back in time.

Peter Hans Kolvenbach (front, center): twenty-ninth Superior General, with his cosmopolitan general staff.  From the book Jesuits: A Multibiographyby Jean Lacouture; (French © 1991, English © 1995) Counterpoint Books, P.O. Box 65793, Washington DC 20035; ISBN 1-887178-05-8.

Today, who is the Superior General of the Jesuits, the so-called “Black Pope” [black here refers to hidden, evil activities, not to race or color] who gives the orders to the actual Pope.  Is it still Jean-Baptist Janssens? 

Phelps:  Janssens, Frenchman.  No, he passed away in 1964.  Then Pedro Arrupe came to power.  Then, after Arrupe died, in 1988, I believe, the present Jesuit General is Count Hans Kolvenbach.  [See photo nearby.]  I call him Count Hans Kolvenhoof.

Martin:  Let’s discuss this position of “General” and, in addition, who is this person, Count Hans Kolvenbach?  Who does he serve?  What are his origins?  Where does he hail from? 

Phelps:  The present General is a Dutchman, his nationality is Dutch. 

Martin:  Where is he?  Physically, where is he?

Phelps:  He resides in Rome, at the headquarters of the Jesuits, called the Church of Jesu.  So, the Jesuit General resides in Rome at, what I just called, the Jesuit headquarters. 

Martin:  The Church of Jesu, is that near the Vatican?

Phelps:  It’s not far from the Vatican, right.  It’s in the same general area.  It’s headquarters of the Knights of Malta. 

Martin:  Is it part of Vatican City, proper?

Phelps:  Right, I believe, yes it is. 

Martin:  Where does Satan fit into this picture, and what is the ultimate goal of the Jesuits, the so-called Society of Jesus?

Phelps:  The Jesuit General, and the other high Jesuit Generals, they are sorcerers.  They are Luciferians, and they worship what they would call Lucifer.  They do not believe in Satan.  They believe in Lucifer. 

Now, according to Alberto Rivera, he was invited—because he was a top Jesuit at the time in the late ’60s—he was invited to a “Black Mass” in Spain where there were quite a few top Jesuit Generals present.  And he called it a “Black Mass”.  Well, when you’re involved in a “Black Mass”, you’re involved in the worship of Lucifer, all dressed in their black capes and so on.

Martin:  I’m fascinated by Count Hans Kolvenbach because nobody in the world knows who this person is.  I’ve never heard the name. 

Phelps:  Let me just tell you that you can see his picture and his top Jesuits—just a second and I’ll get the book.  The name of the book is called Jesuits: A Multi-Biography, by Jean Lacoutre, and that is available, usually, in the bookstores.  It was published in 1995.

Jean Lacoutre is a Frenchman.  He was a communist, is a communist.  On the last page of the pictures in it, that is right adjacent to page 343, you see Peter Hans Kolvenbach.  He’s the Jesuit General, and he looks like just a very evil individual.  There’s a Black man, who’s a high Jesuit, he’s a 29 Superior Jesuit with his cosmopolitan General staff.  One of the General staff looks like Ben Kingsley of Shindler’s List.  There are six White men, and one Black man.  And that’s his General staff.

Martin:  What is the process of choosing a successor General?

Phelps:  The High Jesuits elect him, and he’s elected for life—unless he becomes a “heretic”. 

Martin:  And the so-called “High Jesuits” represent what group?

Phelps:  I would say that they’re the “professed”, the high 4th Degree.  When a Jesuit is professed, he is under the Jesuit Oath; he is under the “Bloody Oath” that I have in my book.

Martin:  Do we have permission to reprint that Oath in our paper?

Phelps:  Of course, absolutely.

Martin:  One of my questions has to do with the Oath and it’s similarity to the Protocols Of The Learned Elders Of Zion, and I wrote that question before I got back to the Protocols portion of your book.

Phelps:  The Jesuits obviously wrote the Protocols because they have carried out every protocol in that little handbook.  They have carried everything out.  And, Alberto Rivera says—and he was a Jesuit—he was greatly maligned, not helped at all by the Apostate, Protestants, and Baptists in this country; he was helped, somewhat, by Jack Chick.  Jack Chick published his story in six volumes, titled Alberto I, II, III, IV, V, & VI.

Alberto Rivera says that it was Jews aligned with the Pope who published the Protocols.  Well, I tend to feel that it was just the Jesuits themselves because they, and they alone, were the ones who were able to bring this to pass.

They’re the ones in the government.  They’re the ones behind professional sports.  The owner of the Pittsburgh Steelers is a Knight of Malta.  The owner of the Detroit Lions is a Knight of Malta.  All your top owners of these ball clubs, for the most part, are Knights of Malta, getting the people whooped up in this hoopla over games and sports, while they’re busy creating a tyranny.  So, that was one of the things in the Protocols—that they would create “amusements”.

Another one they used was Walt Disney, 33rd-degree Freemason—Disneyworld, Disneyland.  Another one was Milton Hersey, with Hersey Park.  They create all of these amusements and games and pastimes to get the people drunk with pleasure, while they’re busy overthrowing the Protestant form of government.

Martin:  Where does Las Vegas factor into all of this?

Phelps:  Las Vegas, well, for the most part, is controlled by the Mafia.  But all the high Mafia families are Roman Catholic, and they are ALL subordinate to the Pope or to the Cardinal of New York, which is Cardinal O’Connor—because the Commission, the Mafia Commission resides in New York.

Frank Costello was a member of the Mob Commission, and he was intimate, personal friends with Knight of Malta, Hollywood mogul, Joe Kennedy.  And that has not changed.

So, the High Knights are good, dear brothers with the High Mafia Dons—the Gambinos, the Lucchese, the Columbos, all of them.  And they control Hollywood, not the Jews.  It’s only Jews who are front-men who are involved in Hollywood and working for the Mafia and for the Cardinal, just like in politics it would be Arlen Spector.  Arlen Spector was Spelly’s [Cardinal Spellman’s] Jew in the assassination [of President Kennedy], and he would never say a word about it. 

Martin:  Now, as we go through here, if there’s anything that you don’t want me to print, please let me know because, literally, I’m going to print everything we say in this conversation.

Phelps:  That’s fine, that’s fine with me because it needs to be said. 

Martin:  Let’s get back to Count Hans Kolvenbach.  I want to shine the spotlight on this guy for just a little bit here.  Let’s talk about him.  What does he do?  Who is he?  Let’s talk about his position as “General”.  How do they exercise this control over the Pope?  Does the Pope know he’s a pawn? 

Phelps:  Ok, one question at a time.  So, which question do you want me to deal with?

Martin:   Let’s just shine the light right on the Count. 

Phelps:  The Jesuit General, ok.

Martin:  Let’s start there, and you tell me everything you want to tell me about that position.

Phelps:  The Jesuit General is the absolute, complete, and total dictator and autocrat of the Order.  When he speaks, his provincials move.  The provincials are his major subordinates.  There are around 83 provincials right now.

As I understand it, the Jesuit Order has divided the world into 83 regions.  Ok?  For each region, there is a Jesuit provincial.  There are 10 provincials in the United States.  There is one for Central America.  There is one for Ireland.  They’ve divided up the world into these provinces.

So it’s old Babylonian provincial government, centered in Nebuchadnezzar or the Jesuit General himself; so it’s strictly a Roman form of government where all the states or provinces are subordinate to this worldwide sovereign. 

The Jesuit General exercises full and complete power over the Order.  He meets with his provincials.  When they decide to start a war or an agitation, he gets the information from the provincial of that country, how best to go about this, the demeanor of the people, and then he uses legitimate grievances to foam an agitation—like the 1964 Civil Rights Movement.  That was ALL a Jesuit agitation, completely, because the end result was more consolidation of power in Washington with the 1964 Civil Rights Act that was written by [the longtime President of the University of Notre Dame, the Reverend] Theodore Hesburgh.

The Jesuit General rules the world through his provincials.  And the provincials then, of course, rule the lower Jesuits, and there are many Jesuits who are not “professed”, so many of the lower Jesuits have no idea what’s going on at the top.  They have no concept of the power of their Order.

It’s just like Freemasonry.  The lower Freemasons have no idea that the High Shriner Freemasons are working for the Jesuit General.  They think that they’re just doing works and being good people.  But the bottom line is that the high-level Freemasons are subject, also, to the Jesuit General because the Jesuit General, with Fredrick the Great, wrote the High Degrees, the last 8 Degrees, of the Scottish Rite Freemasonry when Fredrick protected them when they were suppressed by the Pope in 1773.

So, you have the alignment with the Jesuit Order and the most powerful Freemason they had in the craft, Fredrick the Great, during their suppression.  That is an irrefutable conclusion.  And then, when you see the Napoleonic Wars, the French Revolution and the Napoleonic Wars carried out by Freemasonry, everything Napoleon did, and the Jacobins, whatever they did, completely benefited the Jesuit Order.

It’s to this end that Alexander Dumas wrote his The Count Of Monte Cristo.  The Count is the Jesuit General.  Monte=Mount, Cristo=Christ.  The Count of the Mount of Christ.  Alexander Dumas was talking about the Jesuit General getting vengeance when the Jesuits were suppressed, and many of them were consigned to an island, three hours sailing, West, off the coast of Portugal.  And so, when the Jesuits finally regained their power, they punished all of the monarchs of Europe who had suppressed them, drove them from their thrones, including the Knights of Malta from Malta, using Napoleon.

And Alexander Dumas, who fought for the Italian patriots in 1848, to free Rome from the temporal power of the Pope, wrote many books and one of the books was to expose this, and that was The Count Of Monte Cristo.

So, when you read that book, bear in mind that it’s really a satire on the Jesuit Order regaining their power in France.  The Count of Monte Cristo has an intelligence apparatus that can’t be beat.  Well, that’s the Jesuit Order.

But the Count doesn’t get what he really ought to have, or his last wish, and that’s the love of woman.  He gains back all of his political power; he gains back everything he lost; but he doesn’t have the love of a woman.  And THAT is the Jesuit Order.  They have no women.  They have no love of a woman.  Because to have a wife, to have a woman, means you have an allegiance to your wife and family, and you cannot obey the General.  That’s why they will NEVER be married, and that’s one of the great KEYS to their success. 

They can betray a nation and walk away.  They can betray all the Irish Catholics getting on the Titanic, and walk away.  They can betray us in Vietnam and walk away.  They can betray us every time we go to the hospital and get radiated and cut and drugged, and walk away, because it’s “for the greater glory of God”—Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam: the greater glory of the god who sits in Rome.

Martin:  What is the ULTIMATE goal of the Jesuits?

Phelps:  Their ultimate goal is the rule of the world, with the Pope of their making, from Solomon’s rebuilt Temple in Jerusalem.  That’s their ultimate goal.

Martin:  And why is Solomon’s Temple rebuilt so important?

Phelps:  Because the Jesuits have always wanted that.  When Ignatius Loyola first started the Order, one of the first things he did was, he wanted to go to Jerusalem and set up the Jesuit headquarters there.  So, he went there, he tried to do it and failed, came back, went to school, started his Latin studies, etc.  Maybe it might be a good idea to just review a little bit about Ignatius Loyola.

Martin:  Yes.

Phelps:  Ok, Ignatius Loyola was a Spanish soldier, and he was wounded at a battle between the French and the Spanish, and his leg was shattered.  Well, the French General, because Loyola was very brave in conflict, ordered his own doctors to attend Loyola.  So they set the leg and sent him back to his home—which, of course, he was royalty to the Counsel of Loyola in Spain, in the area of the Basques.

Loyola, through his series of desiring to regain his leg—it had healed improperly, so he made a rack where he would stretch the leg, with severe, horrible, awful pain—and trying to stretch this leg to get it back to normal shape, he endured awful, terrible pain.  He had it rebroken, again, a couple of times and it still did not heal properly, so he had a perpetual limp.  He could no longer be the courtier among women, and as a result, he went into this depression, and he then had this vision of the saints, etc., etc., and he wrote his spiritual exercises. 

I will stop at the spiritual exercises, just for a minute, but I’ll take up from there.  Loyola then wanted to form an army, but when this happened with his spiritual exercises, those spiritual exercises would be basic training for all of his Jesuits.  That’s what they will ALL go through.  That’s what every Jesuit goes through today.

One of the maxims of the spiritual exercises is that if my superior says “black is white and white is black”, then that’s the way it is.  That is in his spiritual exercises.  That is what is quoted in JFK, when Kevin Costner is telling his people: “Hey, people, we’ve got to start thinking like the CIA.  Black is white and white is black.”  That was a Jesuit giveaway that the Jesuits produced that movie, because they’re quoting Ignatius Loyola in that movie from his spiritual exercises. 

So, Loyola had an indomitable will.  He had a will of steel, and he set his mind to regain back what the Papacy had lost to the Reformation.  And so, he went to the Pope, and the Pope in 1540 then created the Jesuit Order.  But this man is a soldier, he’s a lawyer, and he put together a legion of soldiers and warriors to get back what Rome had lost, as well as institute a World Government for the Pope, from Jerusalem.  This was in 1540.

He started the Order in 1536.  He was arrested by the Inquisition, and he was released, and he went to the Pope; he threw himself at the feet of the Pope.  He would be completely at his service.  The Pope chartered him, and that Pope was Pius III.  The Pope chartered them, created the Jesuit Order; now he has Papal protection, and they began their awful history of deeds of blood.  And war after war after war after war, they’re all attributed to the Jesuit Order in some way.  Catholic nobles, with lots of money, donated castles and schools and money to the Jesuit Order. 

Virtually everything they own has been given to them or stolen by them.  Of course, they stole all of the fortunes of the Jews in World War II.  They stole all their gold, all their assets and everything, whenever they went into a country.  What’s just been released is NOTHING compared to what they’ve taken. 

In Edmond Paris’s book, printed by Ozark Publications, called The Vatican Against Europe, it gets into great detail of what they did.  It calls it—the last 30 years of war is all attributable to the Jesuits, their massacres of the Serbs and Jews, etc.  But Edmond Paris did not understand that the Jesuit General—and this is one of the most important points I want to make about Von Kolvenbach—the Jesuit General is in complete control of the international intelligence community:  that’s the CIA, the FBI, the KGB, the Israeli Mossad, the German BND, the British SIS.  The Jesuit General is in COMPLETE CONTROL of the entire intelligence apparatus—FBI, every bureaucratic agency in this country, all of it; he is in complete control of it.

So, whenever he wants to find something out about an individual, they put in the Social Security number, and everything from all of the intelligence apparatus kicks-in and he and his provincials can review everything about that man.  Credit cards, you name it, everything that’s attached to Rome’s social security number, which FDR put upon us in 1933 with the help of Spellman; at the time, I believe he was Archbishop, or maybe it was Cardinal Hayes—but Rome was behind FDR in putting him in office.

The couple of things that he did was implement social insecurity, the income tax, and recognizing Joseph Stalin’s bloody Jesuit USSR government.  So, with the giving of us the Social Security number, that is Rome’s number—that’s why I refuse to use it—and that’s why they want everybody using it for everything: driver’s license, tax return, credit card, everything you do, that number is you and that number is Rome’s number. 

Martin:  Let me just back-up here for a minute.  What comes to mind is Louis Freeh, head of the FBI. 

Phelps:  Roman Catholic, good altar boy.  Probably a Knight of Columbus; I can’t prove it.  But anybody with that kind of power has got to be a Knight of Columbus.

And the Knights of Columbus implement Jesuit politics.  And Louis Freeh was the one behind the Waco atrocity and the Oklahoma City bombing atrocity.  And his top sniper was a Japanese Roman Catholic named Lon Horiuchi.

So, it’s Roman Catholics in control, Knights in control of the FBI, who carried out all of this killing.  And those two men, Louis Freeh and Lon Horiuchi are personally accountable to Cardinal O’Connor of New York.  And Cardinal O’Connor of New York is the most powerful Cardinal in the country.  He is the military vicar.  And that’s why Bush kissed his fanny for going to Bob Jones, because Cardinal O’Connor is the King of the American Empire.  And he rules his Empire from that Palace, St. Patrick’s Cathedral, “the little Vatican”. 

Martin:  And is he in contact, do you think, with Kolvenbach?

Phelps:  Of course.  O’Connor himself is not a Jesuit, but the Jesuits are like the SS of the Catholic Church.  They maintain order.

And the ones closest to him who maintain order are the Jesuits of Fordham University.  Now, one of them—the head of Fordham University, I believe he is an Irishman, is also a member of the CFR [Council on Foreign Relations].  And I have that right here in the Annual Report of the CFR of 1993.  Those Jesuits at Fordham maintain semblance and rule over the Cardinal in New York.  And, of course, the powerful Jesuits of Fordham include Avery Dulles and John Foster Dulles, one of the writers of the book on the Second Vatican Council.

Martin:  Let’s back-up now, let’s go back.  What’s the Council of Trent?

Phelps:  The Council of Trent was the response of Rome to the Protestant Reformation.  Remember—the Protestant Reformation brought us all of the political liberty that we know of today.  There’s no such thing as national sovereignty without the Reformation.  There’s no such thing as private rights without the Reformation.  There’s no such thing as the Law of Nations, as we know of it today, of Montesquieu and the others, without the Reformation.

So, when the Reformation came with their doctrines of salvation by grace through faith alone, and that there was no need for the priesthood to go to Heaven—that all we need is salvation in Christ, and Romans 1:17:  the righteous shall live by faith.  When the Reformation came, it completely stripped Rome of its spiritual power.  The priests were no longer wanted because the people were getting the word of God in a Bible, specifically in Holland, England, and Germany.  And so, with these great revivals breaking forth and the Reformation happening, nations were breaking away from the power of the Pope.  The Holy Roman Empire was breaking up.  Charles V, the Emperor, resigned and became a monk and a gardener.  So, the Lord was moving mightily in breaking the power of the Holy Roman Empire, started by Charlemagne and the Pope. 

Well, this was not good for Rome because they were losing lots of money.  The nations were not paying “Peter’s pence” anymore, which today we call “foreign aid” in this country.  And so the Pope was very upset about his.

What’s he going to do?  These nations are breaking away from us; they’re not under our temporal or spiritual power; and it’s very important to remember that the Pope claims two powers—spiritual and temporal—and with the breaking of his spiritual power, he then lost his temporal power.  In other words, he no longer had the ability to rule the people through the king of the country, because the king was breaking away, like Henry VIII.

So, Henry VIII broke away from the Roman Church and formed the Church of England; he no longer was subject to the Pope.  This was happening in England, in Germany, in Holland, and other places. 

As a result of this, the Devil raised up Ignatius Loyola with his demonisms, his “spiritual exercises” and—because Loyola had been a member of the Spanish Alumbrados, which is what we call the Illuminati today, and he used the Jesuit Order to attempt to regain back what had been taken by the Reformation—what the Lord had done through Luther, Calvin, and Knox.  And, by the way, Luther, Calvin, and Knox—none of those men died violent deaths.  They all lived to older age and died peacefully, amidst the power of the Jesuit machinations. 

The Council of Trent consists of 25 Sessions.  Those 25 Sessions accurse and condemn all the doctrines of the Reformation.  It condemns anybody who does not believe that the literal Jesus Christ is in the host [holy communion bread], and that his literal blood is in the wine.  That’s called transubstantiation.  Anybody who does not believe that is an accursed anathema.  Anybody who believes that their salvation is outside the Catholic Church is accursed anathema.  Anybody who believes in justification by grace through faith—anathema, accursed.  Anybody who believes that the Pope is not the vicar of Christ—accursed, anathema.  You see, all of these doctrines were being put forth as a result of reading the Bible, which produced the Reformation, and so the Jesuits accursed everything that the Reformers were preaching.  This is all in Law called the Council of Trent. 

In the 4th Session, which is probably the most important Session, the Jesuits condemn freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and freedom of conscience.  So, no man has the right to choose his own religion; no man has the right to publish what he feels is the truth; and no man has the right to freedom of conscience. 

Those rights were secured by our Baptist/Calvinist forefathers in the First Amendment.  The man who wrote the First Amendment was James Madison, who was a Baptist/Calvinist, and he was told by that Baptist/Calvinist in Virginia, Doc. John Leland: “If you don’t secure all those rights, Virginia will not ratify the Constitution.”  Virginia was a Baptist/Calvinist state. 

So, we have a warfare between the Council of Trent and the doctrines of the Reformation, particularly as outlined by John Calvin in his Institutes Of The Christian Religion.  Calvin [1536] wrote the Institutes Of The Christian Religion, he finished it when he was 27, and he dedicated it to the King of France.  And because the Jesuits so hated him, he was driven from France and he resided in Geneva to the day of his death, when he became Governor of Geneva.  It’s Calvin and his Institutes Of The Christian Religion vs. Loyola and his Council of Trent, if you want it sewed-up in two major documents. 

Martin:  Council of Trent was what year? 

Phelps:  From 1545-1563, eighteen years.  And Trent is a little town in Italy.  So, it was a Council that took place in the town of Trent, Italy. 

The Presbyterian Westminster Confession And Faith that was finished in 1648, after the 30 Years War, is another extension of Calvin’s Institutes, and is what the Church of Scotland and the Covenanters went by when they resisted the powers of Rome and England.  That document is a major document, and it’s not the new Westminster Confession, it’s the old one of 1648, where they called the Pope the man of sin, that Roman Anti-Christ, and they also denounced anti-Christian tyranny.

And that it is their duty, to use what they call “the sword of the spirit”, which is the Word of God, which we read in Ephesians, Chapter 6, and “the sword of just defense”—the gun, the sword. 

So, us Calvinists believe that there is a time for peace and a time for war, and we do not refuse to go to the battlefield when it’s necessary.  It was the Calvinists who gave us our political liberty in England with Cromwell.  He was a Calvinist and an independent Baptist.  It was Calvinists in Holland who gave the Dutch their political liberty, with William of Orange, and later his son, Prince Maurice, and then later, in our great country, when it was Washington, the Freemason who did not go into that Masonic Lodge that last 30 years of his life—in his own words—who was a Baptist and a Calvinist.  He was baptized in the First Baptist Church of New York by one of his captains, Pastor Gano, all surrounded by Calvinists.

That’s why they didn’t surrender at Valley Forge; that’s why, when they were naked, when they went through the snow, barefoot, they endured that because they were Bible-believing Calvinists and they refused to submit to the tyranny of King George, who was controlled by the Jesuits.

And that is the soul of our country.  If we lose that soul, we’ve lost everything.  And those very same Baptists, in the Second Amendment, secured their right to bear arms, because they secured the right, the “sword of just defense”.  And the “sword of the spirit” is contained in the First Amendment, the right to have the Bible never taken from them.  The two swords of Calvinism are secured in the First and Second Amendments.  Without those first two Amendments, all the others are nothing. 

Martin:  Well, I got to my question #2.  So, let’s go to #3 of the seventy.  (laughter)

How does Shriner Freemason President Harry Truman’s signing into law of the Emergency War Powers Act of 1950 factor into the Jesuit Agenda?

Phelps:  First of all, Harry Truman, who the Japanese called “Dirty Harry”—when they heard the movie Dirty Harry came out, they thought it was a movie about Harry Truman, according to my Japanese pastor friend, Daniel Fuji, who has passed away.

Harry Truman was put in office by the Jesuits, the Pensergast Democratic machine in Missouri.  Harry Truman takes over after FDR’s murder, because he was murdered in the home of Bernard Baruch.  When he did that, he then finished up the war with the hoax called the dropping of the nuclear bombs, to purposely create this greater hoax called the Cold War, that would enable the Vatican to knock over country after country after country, and replace the leaders with dictators, subordinate to the Pope.  That was the purpose of the Cold War. 

And so, when Harry Truman in 1950 signed into law the Emergency War Powers Act, the Cold War was in full force.  They were building bomb shelters, etc.  So the nation was in kind of a frenzy.

When he signed this into law, it put the whole country under military or martial law, and that’s when the flags in every courtroom, state and federal, began to be changed.  And every state flag and every U.S. flag is now trimmed in gold fringe.  And whenever you see a flag trimmed in gold fringe, that means that it is the flag of the Commander-in-Chief.  Now, if it’s the state flag, it means that’s the flag of the governor, as Commander-in-Chief.  And if it’s the federal flag, or the national flag, more correctly, it’s the flag of the Commander-in-Chief in Washington.

So, all your courts are nothing more than courts of military rule.  They all proceed with summary procedures.  The jury has no power of jury nullification.  And they are simply enforcing the laws of the Empire, which I call 14th Amendment America, which is a military-style, King of England-style country.  The courts are nothing more than courts of the king’s bench, as you can see in Blackstone’s Commentaries.

And the banks, as you walk into every bank, they all have a flag trimmed in gold fringe.  The bank is what England would call, in Blackstone’s day, the king’s bank.  So, we have the king’s bank, and we have the king’s bench.  And it’s run according to military rule, according to Berkheimer’s great work Military Rule And Martial Law, published in 1914. 

When Harry Truman did this, there was a consummation of a great plan to put us under the Emergency War Powers Act and, actually, a war rule.  “Daylight savings time” is what was called “war time”.  This country only went to daylight savings time during World War II, and they called it, at that time, war time.  So, nothing’s changed.  We’ve never gone back to not turning back our clocks.  We’re still on war time.  The income tax is a war tax.  It was called a victory tax in 1942. 

So, people are paying a war tax, they’re under war time, they’re under an emergency war powers act, and the courts are war courts. 

Martin:  Regarding the assassination of President John Kennedy, which could take this entire interview, you say that the assassination was ordered by the Jesuit General, executed by Pope Paul VI, and carried out by the “American Pope”, Francis Cardinal Spellman—who, in turn, used the Knights of Malta, Shriner Freemasons, Knights of Columbus, and Mafia Dons, including the FBI and CIA, to carry out the order from Rome.  Would you explain why you believe your particular theory on the assassination to be an accurate representation of the facts?

Phelps:  Sure.  Alright, number one: The powers that be are properly outlined [in his book], and proven through two centuries of showing how it’s all been put together.  Now, as to why, I will be conservative and stick with Fletcher Prouty’s reasons, that he outlined in his JFK and also his other book called The Secret Team.

The reason why Kennedy was assassinated was he wanted to end the Vietnam War, and he wanted to end the rule of the CIA.  That begets two questions:  Did Rome want the Vietnam War?  And, did Rome control the CIA?  The answer is yes on both counts.

We know, on its face, that the Vietnam War was called “Spelly’s War”—Cardinal Spellman’s war.  He went over to the warfront many times and he called the American soldiers the “soldiers of Christ”.  The man who was the Commander of the American forces was a Roman Catholic, CFR member, possibly a Knight of Columbus, I don’t know, but he was General William Westmoreland.

So, Westmoreland was Cardinal Spellman’s agent to make sure that war was prosecuted properly.  And another overseer of Westmoreland was Cardinal Spellman’s boy, Lyndon Baines Johnson.  Lyndon Baines Johnson was a 33rd-degree Freemason.  He was also part of the assassination, with J. Edgar Hoover, another 33rd-degree Freemason.

And Johnson went to Cardinal Spellman’s death at St. Patrick’s Cathedral, and the picture can be seen in Cooney’s work The American Pope.   So, Johnson was completely at the beck and call of Cardinal Spellman through Cartha DeLoach, the 3rd-in-control of the FBI.  According to Curt Gentry, in his Hoover: The Man And The Secrets, DeLoach had a phone at his bedside direct to Johnson, and Johnson could call him anytime.  DeLoach was a Knight of Malta, subject to Spellman. 

Spellman wanted the Vietnam War, why?  Spellman was controlled by the Jesuits of Fordham.  Why did the Jesuit General want the Vietnam War?  The people of Vietnam, the Buddhists, were unconvertible.  They would not convert to Catholicism.  They didn’t need Rome.

There had been a Jesuit presence in Vietnam for centuries, so it had been decided that about a million or so Buddhists would have to be “purged”.  They would later continue this purge of Cambodia, with Pol Pot, and the purge is yet for Thailand.  It was a purging of Laos, Cambodia, and Vietnam of all these Buddhists, just like they purged the Buddhists of China with Mao Zedong, because Mao Zedong was completely controlled by the Jesuits.  So, they wanted the Vietnam War.

The other thing is that Rome is in control of the drug trade.   The Vatican controls all of the drug trade—all of the heroin, all of the opium, all of the cocaine, everything going around in Columbia.

Columbia has a concordat with the Pope.  A concordat is a treaty with the Pope.  Hitler had a concordat.  Mussolini had a concordat.  Franco had a concordat.  They want to set up a concordat here, which was the reason for Reagan formally recognizing the sovereign state of Vatican City in 1984.  The greatest traitor we ever had was Ronald Reagan.

So, they had a concordat.  Columbia has a concordat.  Do you think that drugs running out of Columbia, with a country that has a concordat with Rome, is not controlled by Rome?  If Rome didn’t want the drug trade out of Columbia, they’d end the concordat.  The whole drug trade is run by high Mafia families out of the country of Columbia, subject to the Jesuit General.

And the Jesuit General ran the Opium trade, a couple of centuries ago, out of China.  They ran the silk trade, the pearl trade.  The movie Shogun is but a slight scratching of the surface of the Jesuit “black ships” that trafficked in all of this silk and pearls and gold and opals and everything they could pull out of the East, including opium. 

The Vietnam War was to consolidate and control this huge massive drug-trade that would inundate every American city with drugs, being brought in by the CIA with their Air America, and then distributed by the Trafficante family throughout the United States—Santos Trafficante out of Miami.

So we have the Mafia and the CIA working together in the drug trade.  We have the Mafia and the CIA working together in the assassination of Kennedy. 

The first reason why the Jesuit General [at that time