For Immediate Release
April 18, 2005
Jonathan Levy and Tom Easton
Attorneys for Plaintiffs, Alperin v. Vatican Bank

An Especially Bad Day for the Vatican Bank
 San Francisco:

While the world breathlessly awaits the election of the next Pope, the Vatican’s financial arm, the scandal-plagued Vatican Bank was dealt two blows today by American and Italian courts.

Alperin vs. Vatican Bank

 The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco ruled today that a Second World War restitution lawsuit filed in 1999 against the Vatican Bank and Franciscan Order could proceed.  The lawsuit restitution for Serbs, Jews, and former Soviet citizens for looting of property by the Nazi allied Croatian government during World War II.  The court ruled that claims for conversion of property laundered after the end of the war by the Vatican Bank and Franciscans could proceed.  The Vatican Secretary of State, Cardinal Sodano, perhaps sensing the case was going poorly had recently requested US Secretary of State Rice intervene on the Vatican’s behalf however the US State Department has chosen to abstain.  The amount at issue could exceed $100 million dollars; a copy of the Ninth Circuit decision is available here. PDF$file/0315208.pdf?openelement

 Murder of Roberto Calvi

 In Another unresolved Vatican Bank scandal, Italian authorities announced today that four people have been indicted on murder charges in the death of Italian financier Roberto Calvi, a banker with close ties to the Vatican who was found hanging under a bridge in London in 1982, according to CNN.

Attorneys for the plaintiffs in the Alperin vs. Vatican Bank case include Pepperdine University law professor, Lee Boyd, and Jonathan Levy and Tom Easton.  According to Tom Easton, the Vatican must own up to its past conduct as soon as possible, “an apology is long overdue.”  Jonathan Levy who is also familiar with the Calvi case stated: “The Vatican Bank has for too long clung to the coat tails of a popular Pope (the late John Paul II) with the election of a new Pope, this may soon change, and these longstanding claims seeking justice may finally be resolved.” 

For more information:
Jonathan Levy, Esq.

9th Circuit OKs Suit Against Vatican Over Holocaust

Jeff Chorney
The Recorder
Just in time for the picking of a new pope, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decided Monday that Holocaust survivors can pursue the Vatican Bank for profiting from a Nazi puppet regime.

The decision in Alperin v. Vatican Bank, 05 C.D.O.S. 3216, revives a class action that had been dismissed by San Francisco U.S. District Judge Maxine Chesney.

Groups of Ukrainian, Russian and Belarusian Holocaust victims -- potentially hundreds of thousands, according to plaintiffs attorneys -- had sued the Vatican Bank, the Franciscan Order, the Croatian Liberation Movement and various banks in 1999.

Plaintiffs allege the defendants "profited from the genocidal acts of the Croatian Ustasha political regime," which was installed by the Nazis during World War II, according to the opinion.

The Ustasha regime operated death camps where as many as 700,000 Serbs died. After the Croatian government collapsed at the end of the war, its leaders fled to Italy and some assets went into Vatican control, according to a State Department report. Plaintiffs allege that the Vatican Bank, an arm of the sovereign Vatican government, essentially laundered the money, said plaintiffs lawyer Thomas Easton of Eugene, Ore.

Easton said he believed it was "just a coincidence" that the decision came on the first day cardinals deliberated who will be the next pope.

However, Easton hopes the Catholic church takes advantage of the timing and agrees to settle the case.

"I would think a new pope might want to clean the decks of this kind of stuff," Easton said. "I'm thinking we have a good chance to settle now."

The claims could exceed $100 million, according to a press release put out by Easton's partner in the case, Jonathan Levy of Ohio. Pepperdine University School of Law Professor Kathryn Lee Boyd argued the plaintiffs case at the 9th Circuit.

Chesney had granted a motion to dismiss because she believed the case wasn't justiciable under the political question doctrine. That legal test requires courts to stay out of business normally conducted by the executive and legislative branches.

Monday's divided 9th Circuit panel said Chesney was right, but only regarding the so-called "war objective" claims. Two of the three panel judges -- 9th Circuit Judge M. Margaret McKeown and Senior Illinois District Judge Milton Shadur, sitting by designation -- said they would allow the more "garden variety" tort of conversion claims.

"In the landscape before us, this lawsuit is the only game in town with respect to claimed looting and profiteering by the Vatican Bank," McKeown wrote for the majority. "No ongoing government negotiations, agreements or settlements are on the horizon. The outside chance that the executive branch will issue a statement in the future that has the 'potentiality of embarrassment' when viewed against our decision today does not justify foreclosing the Holocaust survivors' claims."

But the third panelist, 9th Circuit Judge Stephen Trott, said that's not good enough.

"With all respect to my valued colleagues, I see it as a mistake to measure this issue of justifiability by a 'this lawsuit is the only game in town' standard," Trott write in dissent. "This is not our 'game,' period, and we do not become vested with jurisdiction by default of the other branches."

The defendants have not yet decided whether to appeal, said Paul Vallone of San Francisco's Hinshaw & Culbertson, who represents the Franciscan Order.

Although Monday's decision was a setback for his client, Vallone pointed to sections of the opinion that tell the plaintiffs they are by no means home free.

"There are several other obstacles that plaintiffs need to get through," Vallone said.

Indeed, several times the judges noted the complexity and difficulty of the massive case, calling it a "behemoth" and comparing the district court's work on it to Sisyphus, the mythological figure who rolled a boulder up a hill only to have it roll back down for eternity.

Easton, on the other hand, found those comments encouraging. "Those are signals to both sides to settle the case," he said.

The lawyer for the Vatican Bank, Jeffrey Lena of Berkeley, Calif., could not be reached for comment.

What goes around comes around. Be prepared for a WINDFALL of dirty laundry folks! You thought the child molestation scandal was bad. Wait till ALL the
facts on the TRUE Vatican interests come to light! Not even Mel Gibson and his "Catholic commercials" will be able to spin this mess out of existence! Perhaps now more and more will finally realize what he REAL meaning of the word "PROTESTANT" is!?

Me thinks the ones seeking to become "another god on earth" or the "Lord god pope" will be re-thinking this position now. Seriously, would you want to become pope directly after THREE MAJOR LAWSUITS were ok'd by the courts to proceed that are more then likely to get GLOBAL ATTENTION?   PRAISE THE LORD!!!


The Presents of God ministry