• tellafriend.gif about this week's Newsletter.

Creating Evolution
By Nicholas
March 02, 2009



Evolutionists believe that at one time there was absolutely nothing in the entire Universe. They declare that after a big bang and then millions of years of explosive activity from that big bang that we have now have planets, moons, stars, vegetation, insects, fish, animals, humans, etc. What amazes me is how it goes from absolutely nothingness one eon, and then billions of planets, moons, stars, etc. the next.

Here's a quick method you can try the next time you run across an evolutionist. Ask them to explain their reasons for believing such things, but do so in as gentle a manner as possible so as to keep the discourse going. You will find they will first display all the confidence of an expert, but then within just a few minutes you will hear them using words like, "Perhaps".. "Maybe" .. "Could be" .. "Possible" to share their beliefs. Finally, when they have completely lost all confidence to fabricate more so called facts, they will say... “I’m not an expert.”

I have to say, it's an amazing thing to behold. But this is not so much their fault as it is human nature to respond in this way if you believe something you know you cannot prove. One uncanny thing you may also notice is, they use the same words most uneducated preachers out there use when teaching prophecy. They do this because like evolutionists. They truly have no idea as to what they speak. When it gets down to brass tacks, what you'll find is they seek to convince others by their own lack of understanding.

The Creator God does not look to "convince" anyone as much as He seeks that we completely understand the Truth He has by our own ability to reason. He doesn't seek to con us in any way when His Truth is shared.

  • Isaiah 1:18, "Come now, and let us reason together, saith the LORD..."

The Lord simply shares the facts and let's us see Truth for what it is. That way all naysayer's are shot down in one fell swoop. But only after real truth is embraced. As we know, "...faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God." (Romans 10:17) Without this faith He grants us, we cannot hope to understand the intense truths found in His Word. The Word of God is purposely designed for those that seek its treasure. Those that look within it for ways to attack it will always be unable to discern it. No other book on the earth can do this. That fact alone makes it stand out above all man has to offer.

With evolution, you are extremely hard pressed to come up with any facts to scrutinize. Literally all of it is based on circumstantial evidence at best. And a lot of it is just plain guesswork. What shocks me every time I see it is when all the Scientists that push evolution admit it's impossible to prove. Still, millions trust it. Since it has been found to be improvable, many have melded the so called science of evolution into what science can prove to be mutation or variation. The evolutionist knows they cannot prove anything evolved, so they borrow facts dealing with mutation and tag them evolution to win an argument, or at least have a basis in fact to draw on. Kinda like saying the crayfish, or salamanders in the cave evolved to blindness, when in fact they simply mutated due to lack of light. Do my hands evolve as I grow calluses from swinging a hammer? Or did I grow calluses to protect my hands? We will get back to this in a minute.

I saw a video some time back where a preacher asked some people on the street questions about evolution to get a general idea of the mind-set running rampant today. When they first asked the people if they believed in it, all of them displayed 100% confidence in their belief as expected. But as the questioning continued, you saw all sorts anxiety in their comments as well as insecurity. All of them used the term "I don't know" more than once when responding. Words like probably, perhaps, maybe, could be, etc were used repeatedly by each and every one of them. When the questions became more difficult, they all admitted they weren't experts to try and stop the questions. I have to say it was and amazing thing to watch. In just a few moments all of them went from absolute confident defenders of evolution, to people who admitted quite boldly, and repeatedly I might add, that they had no clue as to it's origins. Yet, they still claimed to be staunch believers as they walked away. There is a reason they do this. But I will share why later..

If you ever want to try this on your own, as I have done before, and hope to do again, all you need to do is have a set of questions already in mind ready to go. After they share there faith in evolution by using guesswork and speculation, let them know you just asked them 3 or 4 simple questions they could not answer. This will hopefully start them thinking, which may make them open to your next comments wherein you can glorify the Lord as Creator.

A few questions you may want to use when trying this...

  1. What made up the original matter that caused the big bang?
  2. How did life start after this big bang?
  3. By what means did the code of life, and the enzymes to create that code originate?
  4. Which came first? the code to make the enzymes? Or the enzymes to make the code?
  5. Where is the fossil evidence showing one organism merging into the next? (not simple mutations)
  6. Where is the evidence where mutation creates unique and new structures rather than modified ones?
  7. Why is there a missing link for absolutely every supposed "evolved" species? Not one fossil exists!?
  8. If 50 years of mutating fruit flies has produced only fruit flies, how does mutation create new species?
  9. What is the best evidence that shows the main theory of evolution to be fact?

One thing you may notice right off is when you speak with evolutionists is that they only have faith in their theories and supporting scientists. It's as if evolution has become a religion and they use what we could actually define as faith to support it. Scientific reality is, evolution is based on 100% theory and assumption.  Amazing thing is, Christianity has far more evidence than evolution could ever hope to attain. Christian prophecy alone blows their doors off.

So.. why do they stand as staunch believers in evolution even though they have no clue how to explain it? Sad truth here is, I have found that most believe the “theory of evolution” simply because scientists push it. Because they're supposed scientists, most people would rather associate their beliefs in what they believe to be ideas from "smart people." This way they can ride their intelligence as if it's their own. This is a common human response. They think if they echo the words of what the world calls intelligent people, they will appear intelligent by proxy. The reason this is done is because human nature is such that no one wants to be considered stupid, or worse yet, a religious fanatic. When you have supposed men of science declaring creationism to be idiotic, most will choose to agree so they won't be looked upon as idiots. No one likes to be tagged an imbecile. As most of us learned even as far back as grade school, peer pressure works well in all forms. It can be carried through life in every deceptive manner known to man. It works just as well on adults as it does on children. This scientific theory of evolution is just one more form of peer pressure.

So... getting to the meat of the matter. One major problem I found with evolution is that there are no fossils anywhere to be found that show an ape evolving into a man, a dinosaur into a bird, a fish into a horse, or a worm into a turtle. Amazing as this may seem, this is fact, and every evolutionist knows it! They dress up this obvious lack of evidence by calling it, “the missing link.” That fact alone confirms they have been ADMITTING (in writing) for 150 years they have absolutely no proof whatsoever to support their claims. Nary a spec, nada, zilch, bumpkis, ZERO! Yet, many people still believe their theories because "smart people" teach it.

This method of placing a far-fetched fabrication as an answer to a question is very effectual. In fact, Cyrus Scolfield used this method of deception in his bible commentary of 1910. He filled the KJV bible with all sorts of strange out of context assumptions for prophetic fulfillments. When he hit his preverbal brick wall as the evolutionists do with their missing link fabrication, he declared a "gap theory" as a way to make his assumptions appear plausible. But plausibility is not fact. Like the missing link fiasco, it's guesswork at best. And since the Truth has been uncovered in these last days, we now have Rock hard evidence Scolfield's prophetic comments were wrong.

I have to ask, how can there be so many missing links? If pressed into craving an answer, I can and will give them the benefit of the doubt if they can prove a missing link for perhaps a worm evolving into a lizard, or even a dinosaur into a bird if that's all the missing links there were. But ALL their so called evolved species have missing links! If each and every single so called evolved species has a missing link, then I need to ask WHEN or HOW did all these missing links come up missing? Was their some massive time altering comet, or cataclysmic black hole that sucked each and every one of the missing fossils and ONLY the missing fossils into a 5th dimension, while at the same time leaving all the other fossils all over the planet intact? As expected, even here they cannot answer.

Many say evolution is a slow process and will appear as a butterfly's wings getting smaller, or a newts tongue getting sticky. But that's not evolution, that's adaptation, or even mutation. Like the 50 years of laboratory controlled experiments recently completed on fruit flies. The flies did adapt and even mutate yes, but in the end they simply remained fruit flies. A good example would be like a dog that can be either a terrier or a hound, both are still dogs. Strangely enough, they still use these fruit fly experiments as a basis to prove evolution. You know what that means? They have literally dropped their original definition of evolution, picked up mutation, and tagged it evolution in it's place so as to finally have a place to argue that carries facts they can argue. Tricky, yes, but no less a lie just the same. The reality is, those fruit flies never evolved into birds, horses, or elephants any more than fido did. They didn't even evolve into house flies or horse flies for that matter. They simply remained plain old fruit flies.

We have all seen the drawings of apes emerging to man in encyclopedias over the years I'm sure. What most fail to realize is that those drawings are just that, DRAWINGS! To this day, no proof was ever given to back any of those drawings up. Yes, school books and encyclopedias still state their findings as fact. However, as technology advanced over the years we found some very interesting facts that no scientist can refute.

For example...

Nebraska man” was nothing more than an artists rendition of a scientist's made-up theory. All of that so called "Nebraska man" evidence was nothing more than pure fiction. His arms, legs, body size, shape, color, cranial structure, hair, and facial features were all drawn up from a single tooth they found one day. Not too long after that drawing was made, they discovered the rest of the skeleton for that tooth. It was an extinct pig! Yet Nebraska man still stands upright and proud in most evolutionary circles today. Not much of a mascot if you ask me.

Not long after that, another image in the so called evolutionary chain of events between man and ape called, “Piltdown man” was found to be the remains of a modern ape. What's worse, “Neanderthal man” was soon found to be a modern man who suffered from severe arthritis.

Literally all their theories have been shot down by fellow scientists and STILL they have all these “missing links” in Science books to this day.

Some believe we evolved from apes because apes look like us. This is one thing I love to use on the street wherein it usually gets the evolutionist to admit quite quickly, "I am not an expert." Before I bring up the evolution of ape to man theory, I like to get them to put their own theories to the test, while at the same time offer myself a rock hard method to prove evolution false. Amazing as it may seem, you can actually get them to freely give it to you of their own free will. What do I mean?

It's all in the delivery.

Ask them this... "Do you believe when a species evolves, the old form of the species dies off permanently?" Almost 100% of the time they will give you a resounding yes. Then ask them, "do you believe we evolved from apes?" If they are quick minded, they may just walk off realizing they cannot answer without exposing themselves. If not, they will say yes they do believe we evolved from apes. With that said, ask them "why are there still apes on the planet?" It's here you may find an end to the argument. If the evolved species stands supreme, as they just admitted, while the previous form has died off, then man could never have evolved from apes. Apes still live! If they are our ancestors, they need to be found only in fossilized matter.

Another strange thing about evolutionists is their political incorrectness. If the evolutionist is a woman, read her the following excerpt...

"...The chief distinction in the intellectual powers of the two sexes is shewn [shown] by man attaining to a higher eminence, in whatever he takes up, than woman can attain – whether requiring deep thought, reason, or imagination, or merely the use of the senses and hands" -The Descent of Man, London: John Murray, 1871, 2.327

In other words, the scientist is stating man has evolved further then women in all things. Will the woman you just asked agree with her trusted leaders? If she doesn't, will she now denounce evolution?

I also found quotes regarding the evolutionists thoughts on the human races on the earth at present. Reading them would only anger some, and sadden others. So I won't share them here. Suffice it to say, they are quite racist in nature. Too summarize, the founding fathers of the evolutionary theory believe some races would eventually be replaced by natural selection because they believe other races have evolved further. With that said, is it any wonder we eventually saw men that believed in evolution like Hitler arriving that seek to do away with the so called “lesser” races. I ask, are not their hateful methods contradicting their own belief system in "natural selection" when they seek to kill their fellow man in un-natural ways? How can you preach natural selection, commit genocide, and still be preaching natural selection?

I ask.. why do they think this way? Why do they try so hard to CONvince people evolution is sound and scientific fact? And by the way, both John Paul II and Benedict XVI stated in writing more than once that "evolution is scientifically sound." Yet even the Catholic Bible with it's thousands of verses missing says, God created Adam and Eve. Sp.. why do they think this way?

Sir Arthur Keith (he wrote the “forward” for Darwin’s 100 anniversery edition) said, “Evolution is unproved and unprovable. We believe only because the only alternative is special creation, and that is unthinkable.”

They simply hate the idea of a Creator God! To admit His existence is to admit they are in sin and in need of a Saviour. They hate the idea that they are to be held accountable for their choices in life. For them it is better to deny their sin, than to seek a way to stop their sin.

When the Creator God said "let there be light" in Genesis chapter one, some can't seem to wrap their brains around the idea that this is possible. Some will actually argue that even God appeared after the big bang. Yet, some years ago I watched a scientific experiment wherein the scientists decided to use all that was recorded in Genesis to see if in fact it was possible to happen as God said. So they took a large sonar device, placed it in a dark room with absolutely no light along with a beaker of water. They did this because all that's stated to be in existence at the time God said, "let there be light" in Genesis chapter one, was God Himself, the water, and His voice saying "let there be light.".

  • Genesis 1:2-3, "And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. And God said, Let there be light: and there was light."

With special cameras they recorded the events as they transpired. They turned up the sound and pointed the sonar device at the large beaker of water and to their amazement a small bubble started to form in the center of the water. Within a few moments that small bubble started to glow white hot! And all they used was that which was stated in Genesis to be present at the time of the creation of light.

Below are a few more facts, out of thousands, that prove creationism fact and evolution false.


(as compiled by Creation Evidence Museum - Dr. Carl Baugh)

Evolutionists have constructed the Geologic Column in order to illustrate the supposed progression of “primitive” life forms to “more complex” systems we observe today. Yet, “since only a small percentage of the earth’s surface obeys even a portion of the geologic column…the claim of their having taken place to form a continuum of rock/life/time…over the earth is therefore a fantastic and imaginative contrivance."(1) “The lack of transitional series cannot be explained as being due to the scarcity of material. The deficiencies are real, they will never be filled.” (2) This supposed column is actually saturated with “polystrate fossils” (fossils extending from one geologic layer to another) that tie all the layers to one time-frame. “To the unprejudiced, the fossil record of plants is in favor of special creation.” (3)

1. John Woodmorappe, “The Essential Non-Existence of the Evolutionary Uniformitarian Geologic Column.
2. H. Heribert Nilsson, as quoted in Arthur C. Custance, THE EARTH BEFORE MAN, Part II

Dr. Thomas Barnes, Emeritus Professor of Physics at the University of Texas at El Paso, has published the definitive work in this field. (4) Scientific observations since 1829 have shown that the earth’s magnetic field has been measurably decaying at an exponential rate, demonstrating its half-life to be approximately 1400 years. In practical application its strength 20,000 years ago would approximate that of a magnetic star. Under those conditions many of the atoms necessary for life processes could not form. These data demonstrate that earth’s entire history is young, within a few thousand years.

4. Thomas Barnes, ICR Technical Monograph #4, ORIGIN AND DESTINY OF THE EARTH’S MAGNETIC FIELD.

The Biblical record clearly describes a global Flood during Noah’s day. Additionally, there are hundreds of flood traditions handed down through cultures all over the world. (5) M.E. Clark and Henry Voss have demonstrated the scientific validity of such a Flood providing the sedimentary layering we see on every continent. (6) Secular scholars report very rapid sedimentation and periods of great carbonate deposition in earth’s sedimentary layers. (7) It is now possible to prove the historical reality of the Biblical Flood. (8)

6. M.E.
EGYPT, pp 13-14

Physicist Robert Gentry has reported isolated radio halos of plonium-214 in crystalline granite. The half-life of this element is 0.000164 seconds! To record the existence of this element in such short time span, the granite must be in crystalline state instantaneously. (10) This runs counter to evolutionary estimates of 300 million years for granite to form.

(10) Robert Gentry –CREATIONN’S TINY MYSTERY) 

Man-made artifacts – such as the hammer in Cretaceous rock, a human sandal print with trilobite in Cambrian rock, human footprints and a handprint in Cretaceous rock – point to the fact that all the supposed geologic periods actually occurred at the same time in the recent past. (11)


© 2008 by CEM. All Rights Reserved. www.creationevidence.org

By the way, they also found an iron cup inside a large lump of coal supposedly dated to be 295 million years old. Yet, according to those that deny creationism and the Biblical record, mankind wasn't on the planet back then. According to evolutionists, man evolved enough to be able to use tools and make such a cup around 50,000 years ago. So I have to ask, who made that cup?

In closing... If ever creationists needed one simple example to prove evolution a lie, the duck billed Platypus has got to be it! This amazing animal has...

(A) soft, sensitive "bill" and lays eggs like a duck
(B) fur like an animal
(C) both webbed and clawed feet
(D) pockets in its jaws to carry food like a hamster
(E) a spur on rear legs which is poisonous like a snake's fang

I must ask the evolutionist, if evolution is sound, what were the ancestors of this amazing creature?

Bottom line
If the common man that echoes the claims of evolutionary scientists really knew what the founders of this impossible theory believed, they would probably change their minds. Our job is clear. TELL THEM.



The Presents of God ministry